Global Innovation Policy Center

March 15, 2017

India


Primary Sources

  • A Handbook of Copyright Law (1999)
  • Biological Diversity Act, 2002 (2002)
  • Biological Diversity Rules, 2004 (2004)
  • Circular on Implementing the Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007 (2007)
  • Comprehensive Economic partnership Agreement between Japan and the Republic of India
  • Compulsory License Application No. 1 of 2011, Natco Pharma Limited v. Bayer Corp., Application under Section 84(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 in respect of Patent No.215758, 9.3.2012.
  • Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (as amended up to the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002) (2002)
  • Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1994 (1994)
  • Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999 (Act No. 49 of 1999) (1999)
  • Copyright Act, 1957 (as consolidated up to Act No. 49 of 1999) (1999)
  • Designs (Amendment) Rules, 2008 (2008)
  • Gazette Notification of Trade Marks (Amendment) Rules, 2013 and Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 2010 (2013)
  • Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (copyright Section), Office Memorandum No. 14-35/2015-CRB/LU of 5.9.2016.
  • Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Discussion Paper on Standard Essential Patents and their Availability on FRAND Terms, 1.3.2016.
  • Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Notification on Draft Trademarks Rules, New Delhi, 17.11.2015.
  • Information Booklet for Applicants for Registration of Designs, Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (2010)
  • Information Technology (Certifying Authorities) Rules, 2000 (2000)
  • Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007 (2007)
  • Intellectual Property Rights Policy for Kerala 2008, Law Department, Government of Kerala (2008)
  • Manual of Patent Office Practice and Procedure, 2010, Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (2010)
  • Patent (Amendment) Rules of 2016 (2016)
  • Patents (Amendment) Act, 1999 (1999)
  • Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (2002)
  • Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Act No. 15 of 2005) (2005)
  • Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2005 (2004)
  • Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2006 (2006)
  • Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2012 (2012)
  • Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2013 (2013)
  • Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2014 (2014)
  • The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisment and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution Act No.34 of 2003 (2003).
  • The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Amendment Bill 2012.
  • The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (1980)
  • The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2006)
  • The Companies Act, 2013 (No. 18 of 2013) (2015)
  • The Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 (2007)
  • The Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009 (2009)
  • The Competition Act 2002 (2003)
  • The Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 (as amended up to October 13, 2006) (2006)
  • The Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 (2012)
  • The Copyright (Amendment) Bill No. XXIV 2010 (2010)
  • The Copyright Rules, 2013 (2013)
  • The Customs Act, 1962
  • The Designs Act, 2000 (2000)
  • The Designs Rules, 2001 (2001)
  • The Dramatic Performances Act, 1876 (1876)
  • The Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 (as corrected up to November 30, 2004) (2004)
  • The High Court of Delhi at New Delhi, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL) v. COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER, W.P.(C) 464/2014 & CM Nos.911/2014 & 915/2014, Judgment delivered on: 30.03.2016.
  • The High Court of Delhi at New Delhi, The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford & ORS v. Rameshwari Photocopy Services & ANR, 16.9.2016.
  • Contract Act, 1872
  • The Indian Penal Code (1860)
  • The Information Technology (Electronic Service Delivery) Rules, 2011 (2011)
  • The Information Technology (Intermediaries guidelines) Rules, 2011 (2011)
  • The Information Technology (Reasonable security practices and procedures and sensitive personal data or information) Rules, 2011 (2011)
  • The Information Technology Act, 2000 (2000)
  • The International Copyright Order, 1999 (1999)
  • The National Innovation Act of 2008, draft (2008)
  • The Patents Act, 1970 (as amended up to Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005) (2013)
  • The Patents Rules, 2003 (2013)
  • The Supreme Court of India, Criminal / Civil Original Jurisdiction, Writ Petition (Criminal) No.167 of 2012, Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, 24.3.2015.
  • The Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 2010 (2010)
  • The Trade Marks Act, 1999 (2003)
  • The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (ACT NO. 37 of 1967) (1967)
  • The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act, 2012 (No. 3 of 2013) (2012)
  • Trade Marks (Amendment) Rules, 2010 (2010)
  • Trade Marks (Amendment) Rules, 2013 (2013)
  • Trade Marks (Second Amendment) Rules, 2010 (2010)
  • Trade Marks Rules, 2002 (2002)

Secondary Sources

  • AIPPI (2003). “Jurisdiction and applicable law in the case of cross-border infringement (infringing acts) of intellectual property rights”, Q.174, India, Rajeshkumar H. ACHARYA.
  • AIPPI (2005). “Limitations on exclusive IP Rights by competition law”, Q.187, India, Amarjit SINGH.
  • AIPPI (2005). “Punitive damages as a contentious issue of IP Rights”, Q.186, India, the Indian Group.
  • AIPPI (2006). “Contracts regarding Intellectual Property Rights (assignments and licenses) and third parties”, Q.190, India, Amarjit SINGH.
  • AIPPI (2009). “Border measures and other Means of Customs Intervention against Infringers”, Q.208, India, Tehemtan N. DARUWALLA, 17.8.2009.
  • AIPPI (2010). “Protection against the dilution of a trademark”, Q.214, India, Tehemtan N. DARUWALLA, 17.8.2010.
  • AIPPI (2010). “Protection of trade secrets through IPR and unfair competition law”, Q.215, India, Hemant Singh, 1.10.2010.
  • AIPPI (2011). “Exceptions to copyright protection and the permitted uses of copyright works in the hi-tech and digital sectors”, Q.216B, India, Manoj Menda, 10.10.2011.
  • AIPPI (2011). “The availability of injunctions in cases of infringement of IPRs, Q.219, India, Amarjit Singh, 15.10.2011.
  • AIPPI (2012). “Infringement of trademarks by goods in transit”, Q.230, India, MANOJ MENDA, 30.9.2012.
  • AIPPI (2013). “Relief in IP proceedings other than injunctions or damages”, Q.236, India, Amarjit SINGH MONGA, Sagar CHANDRA, 14.6.2013.
  • AIPPI (2014). “IP licensing and insolvency”, Q.241, India, Himanshu Kane, 12.9.2014.
  • AIPPI (2014). “Patents: Prior User Rights”, Q.228, India, Hari Subramaniam, 12.5.2014.
  • AIPPI (2014). “Second medical use or indication claims”, Q.238, India, Pravin Anand, 20.8.2014.
  • AIPPI (2015). “Limitations of the Trademark Protection”, Q.195, India, Manmohan SINGH.
  • AIPPI (2015). “Trade secrets: Overlap with restraint of trade, aspects of enforcement”, Q.247, India, Himanshu KANE, 19.5.2015.
  • AIPPI (2016). “Study Question (Copyright) – Linking and making available on the Internet”, India, Manoj MENDA, 1.9.2016.
  • Anand and Anand (2014). “India” in Anti-counterfeiting 2014 – A Global Guide, pp.133-138, World Trademark Review.
  • Bloomberg, Merck to Bristol-Myers Face More Threats on India Patents, 28.1.2014
  • Business Standard, IPAB stays revocation of Pfizer’s patent on drug Detrol, 26.3.2014
  • Business Standard, Over a fifth of FMCG products in India are fake or smuggled, 8.9.2015
  • Copenhagen Economics, Closing the Gap – Indian Online Intermediaries and a Liability System Not Yet Fit for Purpose, March 2014.
  • Embassy of the United States, Trademark – IPR Toolkit (retreived November 2013).
  • Expresspharmaonline.com, Blocked in transit, Aashruti Kak, 16-30 April 2009
  • Government of India, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion, National Intellectual Property Rights Policy, 12.5.2016.
  • Government of India, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Department of Information Technology, R&D in IT Group, Office memorandum regarding Curtailment of Computer Software Piracy No. DIT/IPR/1.2/15/2006, 11.9.2006.
  • Groverlaw Advocates, Protecting designs in India, Vikram Grover, World Trademark Review.
  • Hindustan Times, Enough with film piracy: Bollywood demands action, 30.8.2016
  • IFPMA, Comments on the August 12, 2014 “Revised Draft Guidelines for Examination Of Patent Applications In The Field Of Pharmaceuticals”, 2.9.2014.
  • Indian Patent Office, Manual of Patent Practice & Procedure (Third Edition), Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks, India, 2008.
  • IndiaSpend.org, Patent Delays Threaten “Make In India”, 12.1.2016
  • Inforrm’s Blog, Case Law, India: Shreya Singhal v Union of India: Law on offensive communications ruled unconstitutional, Jonathan McCully, 30.4.2015
  • Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) Blog, Another signal that India is becoming more receptive to software patents, Jacob Schindler, 31.8.2015
  • Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO), Submission of comments regarding the USTR 2014 Special 301 Review, Request for Public Comment (79 Fed. Reg. 420), 7.2.2014.
  • Intellectual Property Watch, India IPR Policy Update: Final Draft Circulated, William New, 23.07.2015
  • Intellectual Property Watch, India’s IP Policy On Stage As Modi Heads To US, Patralekha Chatterjee, 5.9.2014
  • International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 2012 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement: India, 10 February 2012.
  • International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 2013 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement: India, 8 February 2013.
  • International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), 2014 Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement: India, 7 February 2014.
  • IPR Think Tank, National IPR Policy (First Draft), December 19, 2014
  • KPMG, FICCI (2015). Sell SMART: Moving Towards a SMARTer Consumer Market.
  • Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Draft Licensing Guidelines and Formats for GM Technology Agreements, Lexology, 1.6.2016
  • Legally India, Angry CLATers open letter: 135 out of 150 questions plagiarised, but managed to get 20 answers wrong, allege bias, 7.6.2015
  • Legally India, Did CLAT 2015 infringe copyright by plagiarising questions? SpicyIP thinks maybe yes, 12.6.2015
  • Livelaw.in, Indian Copyright Act Now Covers Internet And Online Streaming – Statutory Licensing Requirements, 8.9.2016
  • Livemint, Bombay HC upholds IPAB order on Nexavar’s generic copy, 21.7.2014
  • Livemint, Copyright Act now covers online streaming too, 6.9.2016
  • Livemint, DIPP seeks details on blood cancer drug for issuance of CL, 19.10.2014
  • Livemint, India to unveil new IPR policy in two months, 8.8.2015
  • Livemint, Panel backs compulsory licence on cancer drug, 11.9.2013
  • Livemint, Patent office eases rule for pharma companies, 29.10.2014
  • Majmudar & Co., Protection of Unregistered Trademarks in India: Passing Off Action, (accessed November 2013).
  • Managing Intellectual Property, Overcoming delays and inconsistency at the Indian Patent Office, 4.9.2015
  • Mayer Brown, Offshoring to India: Are Your Trade Secrets and Confidential Information Adequately Protected?, Sonia Baldia, Business & Technology Sourcing Review, 2008.
  • Microsoft, India News Center, Microsoft declared Well-Known mark in India, 25.3.2014
  • Mittal, A. (2010). “Patent Linkage in India: Current Scenario and need for Deliberation”, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol. 15, pp.187-196.
  • Mondaq, Cyber Squatting Laws In India, 29.11.2012
  • Mondaq, India: Indian Court Says No to Drug Patent Linkage, 13.7.2010
  • Motion Picture Association (MPA), News Release, Online Piracy a Genuine Threat to the Indian Film & Television Industry, 15.12.2009
  • Nomani, Z. M. and Rahman, F. (2011). “Intellection of Trade Secrets and Innovation Laws in India”, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol. 16, pp. 341-350.
  • Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade marks (2015). Guidelines for Examination of Computer Related Inventions (CRIs), 21.8.2015
  • Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks Office, (2014). Guidelines for Examination Of Patent Applications In The Field Of Pharmaceuticals, October 2014.
  • Outlook India, Copy This, 17.9.2014
  • PMGIP, Patent Opposition in India, 2014 (accessed July 2014).
  • Rediff.com Business, After Boeing, IBM defends India on trade, industrial policies, 14.3.2014
  • Reuters, Cipla asks India to revoke Novartis patents on respiratory drug, Zeba Siddiqui, 30.10.2014
  • Reuters, U.S., India discuss intellectual property concerns, 20.6.2015
  • Reuters, UPDATE 2-Modi, Merkel vow to revive trade efforts, promote clean energy, 5.10.2015
  • RNA Intellectual Property Attorneys, Standing up for well-known marks in India, World Trademark Review, pp. 112-13, June/July 2014.
  • RNA Intellectual Property Attorneys, Taking issue with counterfeits in India, World Trademark Review, pp. 106-107, August/September 2014.
  • RNA Intellectual Property Attorneys, Trade Secrets law in India soon?, Lexology, 13.6.2016
  • Sharma, A. (2009). “Indian Perspective of Fair Dealing Under Copyright Law: Lex Lata or Lex Ferenda?”, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol. 14, pp. 523-531.
  • Sidak, J. G. (2015). “FRAND in India: The Delhi High Court’s emerging jurisprudence on royalties for standard-essential patents”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 609-618.
  • Spicy IP, Breaking News: Delhi HC Issues Notice on “Patent Working” PIL, 1.9.2015
  • Spicy IP, Ericsson vs CCI- The Future of Indian SEP Disputes?-II, 4.5.2016
  • Spicy IP, Ericsson’s Offer of SEP terms to TCL held to adhere to FRAND standards by U.S Court, 16.8.2016
  • Spicy IP, On the Common Law Admission Test, 2015 A.K.A The COPYC(L)AT, 12.6.2015
  • Spicy IP, Shreya Singal v. Union of India: Part II – Copyright Infringement and Intermediary Liability, 2.4.2015
  • Spruson & Ferguson, India Update: Indian Government introduces amended Patent Rules, 25.5.2016
  • The Economic Times, Commerce and Industry Ministry considering proposal for compulsory licence to anticancer drug, 24.7.2015
  • The Economic Times, Counterfeit goods real challenge to ‘Make in India’: Report, 31.8.2015
  • The Economic Times, Govt to review FDI policy in pharma sector on Monday, 22.11.2013
  • The Economic Times, India rejects Lee Pharma’s compulsory licence plea, 18.8.2015
  • The Economic Times, India rejects Swiss drug maker Roche Patent claims on Valcyte again, 24.7.2015
  • The Economic Times, Indian Patent Office puts on hold guidelines for patenting software, 22.12.2015
  • The Economic Times, Revised preferential market access policy gives level playing field to US companies: IBM, 20.2.2014
  • The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), Protection of Industrial Design in India: Issues and Challenges, Briefing Paper, March 2013.
  • The Indian Express, GM technology: Compulsory licensing rules withdrawn after outcry from crop research majors, 24.6.2016
  • The Indian Express, Will Real IP Policy Stand up? (accessed November 2015).
  • The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation (ITIF), Why India’s PMA Will Harm the Indian and Global Economies, S.J.Ezell, March 2014 (accessed July 2014).
  • The Software Alliance (BSA), Comments on the draft Guidelines for Examination of Computer Related Inventions, 2013.
  • The Times of India, Viewing pirated films online not an offence: Bombay HC, 5.9.2016
  • Thefirm.moneycontrol.com, Bombay HC Upholds Natco’s Compulsory License, 19.7.2014
  • TwoFour Insight Group, Possible Exploitation of Compulsory Licenses in India, 31.7.2015
  • Vaish Associates Advocates, Intellectual Property & Information Technology Laws News Bulletin, Vol. VI, Issue 1, May-June 2011.
Previous Article
Next Article
Subscribe for updates from GIPC
Contact Us
The Global Innovation Policy Center U.S. Chamber of Commerce 1615 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20062
202-463-5601
gipc@uschamber.com
All media inquiries:
Please contact Scott Hall at smhall@uschamber.com or 202-463-5817.